Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions
 

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2005

Abstract

At least three federal circuits have approved a trial judge's decision to give a cautionary accomplice testimony instruction when an alleged accomplice testifies for the defendant. Several state courts and at least one military court have done likewise. Other state courts, in contrast, have explicitly disapproved giving such an instruction and courts in at least one state are divided on the issue.

Part I of this article briefly reviews how courts have traditionally determined whether a prosecution witness is an "accomplice,” and will provide representative samples of cautionary instructions. Part II will examine the federal decisions8 upholding giving a similar instruction when the prosecutor claims that a defense witness is an accomplice and will show that several United States Supreme Court decisions which are frequently cited as supporting the practice do not really do so. Part III will argue that, except perhaps in very rare cases, it is not appropriate to give such an instruction about a defense witness.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.