Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions
 

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1998

Abstract

Before 1986, the Common Law provided that physicians and hospitals had no duty to admit or treat persons who sought their care except in limited circumstances. Congress enacted The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) to curb this so-called patient-dumping problem. EMTALA provides, essentially, that Medicare-participating hospitals must treat all patients who arrive in emergency conditions.

This article first discusses the patient-dumping problem and how EMTALA has provoked many hospitals to curtail their emergency facilities in order to avoid treating indigent and uninsured patients. The Article then proceeds to analyze the specifics of EMTALA’s main statutory provision, Section 1395, and focuses on EMTALA’s particular impact on indigent elderly persons who have neither personal insurance nor Medicare. Next follows an explanation of how EMTALA may encourage, indirectly, hospitals to dump elderly patients who do not have Medicare. The argument is they presented that EMTALA’s definitional flaws and weak enforcement mechanisms make it an ineffective statute. A number of ways designed to strengthen the statute are then presented. Finally, an examination of society’s ethical obligations to treat its elderly citizens is undertaken and a conclusion reached which suggests that physicians have an affirmative obligation to treat indigent elderly patients as a condition to their licensure.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.