Abstract
The widespread adoption of remote work in the United States has strained the workability of the nerve center test of Hertz Corp. v. Friend. This comment analyzes how federal courts have applied the nerve center test to fact patterns involving partially or fully remote corporations. Further, it proposes a novel solution to this jurisdictional problem: the Key Person Test.
Recommended Citation
John Andrikos,
How to Apply Hertz Corp. v. Friend in the Age of Remote Work,
34
Cath. U. J. L. & Tech
41
(2026).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.edu/jlt/vol34/iss2/5
Included in
Civil Procedure Commons, Courts Commons, Jurisdiction Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons
