Abstract
The oil market is a volatile universe. The price of the commodity has a profound impact both on the national and global economies and on the lives of everyday consumers. Consider the high prices of 2022 compared with the record lows seen in 2020, the price of oil affects almost everything. The United States is one of the top oil producing nations in the world. The size and importance of the industry has led to a somewhat unique area of the legal practice known as oil and gas law. Among its many tenants is an instrument known as a farmout contract. Farmout contracts have steadily grow in use by the industry since their inception, supplementing and even replacing the oil and gas lease, which traditionally has been the primary legal mechanism under which oil drilling takes place.
Oil and gas leases generally obligate lessees to drill continually or else face breach liability. In response, many courts eased this requirement of strict performance by way of novel and established legal doctrines when the lessee’s nonperformance was caused by circumstances outside of its control. However, even though, farmees – the parties that are obligated to drill under farmout contracts – are generally subject to the same drilling requirements, they do not enjoy the same judicial protections as oil and gas lessees. No current legal doctrine can readily excuse their nonperformance, no matter how blameless the farmee may be. This is the problem of the innocent, nonperformance farmee. The following comment examines the problem’s relevant background, analyzes the shortcomings in the current law, and suggests two solutions for future parties and courts to consider.
Recommended Citation
Benjamin Idzik,
The Trouble with Farmouts: The Problem of the Innocent, Nonperforming Farmee,
71
Cath. U. L. Rev.
823
(2022).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol71/iss4/10
