Document Type


Publication Date



Some confusion seems to confront us when we think of the place of equity in our law. We tend to think of equity only as a means of enforcing a handful of well-established equitable institutions, such as mortgages, trusts, etc., or as a means of granting specific rather than substitutional relief, and forget that the Court of Chancery was originally established to assure a fair and just resolution of those controversies that the common-law judges could not, or would not, satisfactorily resolve. A recent illustration of this confusion can be found in Evans v. Mason, where the court refused to permit the recovery of damages for breach of an oral contract because of the Statute of Frauds.

Included in

Legal History Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.