Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions
 

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2017

Abstract

This article proceeds as follows. Part I describes the historical background of the modern class action rule in relation to civil rights. More specifically, this Part reveals how the drafters deliberately crafted the rule to address desegregation obstructionism. Part II analyzes Supreme Court jurisprudence interpreting Rule 23(b)(2) over the course of the last fifty years, identifying three primary periods in which the pendulum has swung: from a heyday of liberal class certification for broad injunctive relief for newly created rights; to a heightened critique and retraction of class certification; to a complex gauntlet of contemporary barriers involving evidentiary hurdles, contractual restrictions and access limitations. Part III critiques modern class action jurisprudence and concludes that it fails to sufficiently fulfill the drafters’ intent of creating an efficient and just procedural mechanism for pursuing systemic racial equality. The article recommends a contemporary judicial interpretation more anchored to the bone, rooted in Rule 23(b)(2)’s strong civil rights mission.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.