Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2013
Abstract
The conservative legal movement has long stood simultaneously for originalism and judicial restraint. But in the past few years, the tension between a commitment to interpreting the Constitution as its authors intended and deferring to the will of legislators and the executive has become painfully clear. Does originalism demand judicial restraint, or is the Constitution undermined by such restraint?
Recommended Citation
Joel Alicea, Real Judicial Restraint, 17 NAT’L AFF. 69 (2013).
COinS
