Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2001
Abstract
This article explores institutional alternatives for balancing the competing trade and non-trade concerns at the national and global levels in relation to the recognition and enforcement of judgments. It argues against a private international law convention of the kind that is currently being negotiated at the Hague Conference on Private International Law, and against quasi-constitutional and constitutional solutions, such as those employed by the European Union and the United States. Rather, the article argues that managing the tensions between trade and non-trade values and between state autonomy and globally established standards can best be achieved through a supplementary agreement in the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Recommended Citation
Anotnio F. Perez, The International Recognition of Judgments: The Debate Between Private and Public Law Solutions, 19 BERKELEY J. INT’L L. 44 (2001).
