Antitrust Law – Standing to Sue – Prices – Consumers are Precluded from Showing “Injury” within the Meaning of Section 4 of the Clayton Act by Establishing that they Paid Higher Prices for Goods Because of Illegal Price-Fixing of a Manufacturer with Whom they Did Not Deal Directly – Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977)

Authors

Catherine F. Klein, The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of LawFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1977

Recommended Citation

Catherine F. Klein, Antitrust Law – Standing to Sue – Prices – Consumers are Precluded from Showing “Injury” within the Meaning of Section 4 of the Clayton Act by Establishing that they Paid Higher Prices for Goods Because of Illegal Price-Fixing of a Manufacturer with Whom they Did Not Deal Directly – Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), 46 U. CIN. L. REV. 875 (1977).