Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2013
Abstract
The decision in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. left open a number of questions about the scope of the Alien Tort Statute (ATS). One such question is the extent to which Kiobel ’s holding on extraterritoriality applies to the oft-neglected final words of the ATS: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States.” What if one such treaty obliged the United States to provide a civil forum for litigation ofhumanrights violations that occurred abroad and did not involve piracy?
Recommended Citation
Geoffrey R. Watson, “Or a Treaty of the United States”: Treaties and the Alien Tort Statute After Kiobel, 107 AM. J. INT’L L. E4 (2013).