Seigenthaler Debates

Resolved: Governmental Destruction of a Traditional Site of Worship on Government-Owned Property Requires a Strict Scrutiny Analysis under the First Amendment

Streaming Media

Document Type

Event

Publication Date

3-12-2025

Abstract

Catholic Law hosted the fourth annual Seigenthaler Debates on Wednesday, March 12. The event, co-sponsored by the Law School’s Federalist Society and American Constitution Society chapters, brings together prominent First Amendment scholars each year to debate pressing constitutional issues.

This year’s debate, held virtually, centered on the resolution: “Resolved: Governmental Destruction of a Traditional Site of Worship on Government-Owned Property Requires a Strict Scrutiny Analysis under the First Amendment.” Representing the Pro position was Josh McDaniel, Assistant Clinical Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Faculty Director of the Religious Freedom Clinic, where he guides students in representing a diverse array of religious clients. Arguing the Con position was Lael Weinberger, an associate at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher in Washington, D.C., specializing in litigation, appellate law, constitutional law, and administrative law.

The debate was moderated by Judge Paul B. Matey of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Link to event summary

Share

COinS